The Warrior 40 Sailboat

Published Specification for the Warrior 40

Keel & Rudder Configuration: Fin keel with skeg-hung rudder
Hull Material: Fiberglass (GRP)
Length Overall: 39'4" (12.00m)
Waterline Length: 31'3" (9.53m)
Beam: 13'0" (4.0m)
Draft: 5'0" (1.52m)
Rig Type: Cutter
Displacement: 18,739lb (8,500kg)
Ballast: 8,268lb (3,750kg) (Iron)
Water Tank Capacity: 156 gallons (591 litres)
Fuel Tank Capacity: 50 gallons (189 litres)
Hull Speed: 8.1 knots
Designer: Angus Primrose & Bill Dixon
Builder: Trident Marine Ltd. (UK)
Year First Built: 1988

Options & Alternatives

The Warrior 40 sailboat was part of a broader family of boats produced by Trident Marine, which included variations based on similar hull designs. While there were no widely documented alternative versions of the Warrior 40 itself, Trident Marine did offer other models that shared design elements:

• Warrior 38: A slightly smaller version with similar offshore cruising capabilities.

• Voyager 35: A pilothouse version designed for more enclosed sailing comfort.

• Challenger 35: An aft-cockpit variant offering a different deck layout.

Sail Areas & Rig Dimensions

Overall Rig Configuration: The Warrior 40 is configured as a cutter. It is equipped with an in-mast furling mainsail, a self-tacking staysail, and a large overlapping genoa (set at 135% of the foretriangle area). This combination is typical for offshore cruisers designed to offer versatility when sailing under varying conditions.

Total Sail Area Estimate: Although an explicit total sail area value isn’t consistently listed in the published specifications, design ratios (such as a Sail Area-to-Displacement Ratio of about 15.0) suggest a combined total in the range of approximately 660–680 square feet. This total, derived from the overall design and displacement figures, aligns with the expectations for a boat of approximately 12 meters overall length.

Inferred Breakdown into Individual Sails: Since direct figures for the individual sails (mainsail, staysail, genoa) are not provided in the sources, we can make a reasoned estimation based on typical cutter rig designs for bluewater cruisers of a similar size:

• Mainsail: Likely around 280–300ft².
• Staysail: Likely in the region of 130–150ft².
• Genoa (135%): Likely approximately 250–270ft².

These estimated values are consistent with the boat’s overall performance parameters and the total sail area inferred from the published Sail Area/Displacement Ratio. They provide a reasonable approximation but should be regarded as inferred figures rather than documented facts.

Published Design Ratios
The Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

Based on the published design ratios of the Warrior 40, we can infer several theoretical sailing characteristics that paint a clear picture of the boat’s behaviour offshore:

• Sail Area-to-Displacement Ratio (15.0): A ratio around 15.0 is moderate. This means the Warrior 40 has enough sail power to provide solid performance in moderate wind conditions but isn’t designed as a performance cruiser. In lighter winds, it will require a fuller, well-trimmed sail plan to keep moving at a pleasant pace, while in stronger winds its moderate ratio helps prevent excessive speed that might compromise control. This balanced figure is ideal for a bluewater cruiser that prioritizes safety and reliability over outright speed.

• Ballast-to-Displacement Ratio (44.1%): With a ballast ratio exceeding 40%, the boat is constructed to be quite stiff. In practical terms, this high ratio indicates that the Warrior 40 is very stable under sail. It can resist excessive heeling and quickly recover from gusts or challenging sea conditions. This level of stability is key for offshore passages, as it contributes greatly to both safety and comfort by reducing the boat’s tendency to roll dramatically.

• Displacement-to-Length Ratio (411): A high displacement/length ratio, such as 411, categorizes the Warrior 40 as a heavy-displacement cruiser. This means the boat carries substantial weight relative to its waterline length. The consequence is a vessel that accelerates more slowly but offers a very smooth and secure ride in heavy seas. It will track steadily through waves, providing a more comfortable internal motion—a desirable trait on long journeys where a gentle motion can reduce crew fatigue and improve overall liveability.

• Comfort Ratio (41.6): The comfort ratio offers insight into how the boat will handle ocean swell and wave action. A higher comfort ratio, like 41.6, suggests that the Warrior 40 is designed to minimize uncomfortable pounding and rolling motions that can unsettle both crew and passage provisions. In effect, the boat should feel relatively settled at sea, even in less-than-ideal conditions, reinforcing its status as a vessel built for extended offshore cruising.

Together, these design ratios indicate that the Warrior 40 was engineered as a sturdy, reliable offshore cruiser. It is clearly not a light, nimble racer but rather a vessel optimized for handling rough waters with ease. The moderate sail area-to-displacement ratio ensures it has enough power without compromising stability, while the high ballast ratio and heavy displacement contribute to a calm and secure ride in challenging conditions. The elevated comfort ratio further supports its suitability for long passages, where minimizing crew fatigue and maximizing safety are paramount.

But the Design Ratios are Not the Whole Story...

Using design ratios can provide a useful first glance at a sailboat’s potential performance, but there are several limitations when relying solely on them to define a vessel's sailing characteristics:

• Simplified Assumptions: Design ratios such as the displacement-to-length (D/L), sail area-to-displacement (SA/D), ballast ratio, and comfort ratio are calculated based on simplified models that assume idealized, steady-state conditions. They do not incorporate the full complexity of a boat's hull shape, appendage design, and dynamic behaviour under varying sea states. For example, two boats with similar ratios may behave very differently if one has a hull shaped for fast planing and the other is optimized for a smooth motion in heavy seas.

• Static versus Dynamic Performance: These ratios reflect static measurements—often based on a "design" or "half-load" displacement rather than full load. Real-world conditions such as loading, crew weight distribution, and water conditions can modify the actual performance considerably. The ratios therefore might not accurately predict how the boat will respond in gusty winds or choppy seas, where dynamic effects like pitching, rolling, and weather helm play a significant role.

• Measurement and Data Variability: Manufacturers might use different conventions when publishing measurements. For instance, discrepancies in how sail area is reported (a full, overlapping genoa versus a working jib) or whether the displacement value represents an unloaded or fully equipped condition can lead to misleading comparisons. This variability means that similar ratios could be based on inconsistent data, making objective comparisons challenging.

• Neglect of Qualitative Characteristics: Quantitative ratios do not capture qualitative aspects such as interior comfort, ergonomics, build quality, or handling nuances. A boat might have an excellent comfort ratio on paper yet require a skilled hand to manage its weather helm or balance its sail trim effectively under real sailing conditions.

• Overemphasis on a Single Metric: No single ratio can fully define a boat’s behaviour. For example, a high SA/D might suggest good performance in light winds, but if coupled with a high D/L, the boat may still accelerate sluggishly or be less responsive in rough conditions. The interrelationship between various ratios—and the design compromises inherent in any vessel—means that they should be used only as part of a broader evaluation that includes actual sea trial data and handling characteristics.

Summary
While design ratios offer valuable insights into characteristics like heaviness, power, and comfort, they are inherently limited by their reliance on simplified, static assumptions, inconsistencies in measurement, and an inability to capture dynamic and qualitative performance aspects.

For a holistic understanding of a sailboat’s sailing behaviour, these ratios should be complemented with real-world trials and qualitative observations.

Yachting Monthly's review of the Warrior 40...

More Specs & Key Performance Indicators for Popular Cruising Boats

30' to 35'

35' to 40'

40' to 45'

45' to 50'

50' to 55'

Over 55'