The Contest 44 Sailboat
Specs & Key Performance Indicators

Published Specification for the Contest 44

Keel & Rudder Configuration: Fin keel with skeg-hung rudder.
Hull Material: Fiberglass (GRP).
Length Overall: 44'0" (13.41m)*.
Waterline Length: 38'3" (11.66m)*.
Beam: 13'1" (3.99m)*.
Draft: 6'2" (1.88m)*.
Rig Type: Masthead sloop.
Displacement: 39,062 pounds (17,718 kilograms)*.
Ballast: 13,227 pounds (6,000 kilograms)*.
Sail Area: 990ft² (91.97m²)*.
Water Tank Capacity: 137 gallons (519 litres).
Fuel Tank Capacity: 75 gallons (284 litres).
Designer: Dick Zaal.
Builder: Conyplex (Netherlands).
Year First Built: 1997.
Year Last Built: 2000.
Number Built: 18.

* Used to derive the design ratios referred to later in this article - here's how they're calculated...

Options & Alternatives

The original Contest 44 Classic was designed by Dick Zaal and built by Contest Yachts - Conyplex between 1997 and 2000. However, later versions, such as the Contest 44CS, were designed by Georg Nissen, marking a shift in design approach.

The 44CS variant featured a taller mast, deeper keel, and larger sail area, making it a more performance-oriented model compared to the standard Contest 44.

Beyond the Contest 44CS, Contest Yachts continued evolving their designs, leading to newer models such as the Contest 48CS, which built upon the principles of the 44CS but offered increased size and refinements.

Published Design Ratios
The Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

• Sail Area/Displacement Ratio (18.5): This ratio indicates how much sail power the boat has relative to its weight. A value of 18.5 suggests that the Contest 44 is a moderate performer, capable of handling light winds reasonably well but optimized more for comfort and stability over high-speed performance. It’s not a racing yacht, but it provides steady cruising performance.

• Ballast/Displacement Ratio (37.9): This shows how much weight is concentrated in the keel to resist tipping. A high ballast ratio like 37.9% means the boat has good stability and resistance to heeling, making it a solid choice for offshore cruising. This allows it to manage rough seas while keeping a steady course.

• Displacement/Length Ratio (229): This ratio tells us about the boat's weight in relation to its length. A value of 229 places the Contest 44 in the moderate displacement category, meaning it's a stable, comfortable cruiser rather than a fast, lightweight vessel. It can carry provisions for long passages, absorbing the motion of waves efficiently without excessive bouncing.

• Comfort Ratio (32.9): This ratio is particularly useful for offshore cruising boats. A comfort ratio of 32.9 suggests the Contest 44 offers a smooth ride in ocean conditions, absorbing wave impacts effectively. It's designed for long-distance sailing without excessive motion, making extended voyages more enjoyable.

• Capsize Screening Formula (1.9): A value below 2.0 is considered safe for offshore cruising, meaning the Contest 44 is a seaworthy vessel with reduced risk of capsizing in heavy weather.

Summary: The Contest 44 is designed for offshore cruising, prioritizing stability, comfort, and seaworthiness over high-speed performance. Its balanced sail area, moderate displacement, and strong ballast give it a dependable handling profile, well-suited for long-distance cruising in varying conditions. While not the fastest boat, it offers secure and comfortable sailing, making it ideal for those seeking a smooth, capable cruiser for extended journeys.

But the Design Ratios are Not the Whole Story...

Design ratios are useful for comparing sailboats and predicting their sailing characteristics, but they have several limitations:

1. Simplified Metrics: Design ratios reduce complex boat dynamics into single numbers, which can oversimplify real-world performance. They don’t account for factors like hull shape, weight distribution, or sail efficiency.

2. Lack of Context: Ratios like Sail Area/Displacement (SA/D) and Displacement/Length (D/L) provide general insights, but they don’t consider how a boat is actually sailed. A boat with a high SA/D ratio may seem fast, but if it has poor sail trim or excessive wetted surface, it may not perform as expected.

3. Ignoring Hull Design: The Capsize Screening Formula (CSF) and Comfort Ratio assume traditional hull shapes. Modern designs, such as wide-beam hulls or twin-keel configurations, may not fit neatly into these calculations.

4. Environmental Factors: Ratios don’t account for wind conditions, sea state, or crew skill. A boat with a favorable Ballast/Displacement ratio may still struggle in rough seas if its hull shape isn’t optimized for stability.

5. Rigging and Sail Plan: The ratios don’t reflect differences in rig type, sail plan, or reefing systems. A boat with a high SA/D ratio may be powerful, but if it lacks effective reefing options, it could be difficult to handle in strong winds.

6. Weight Distribution: The Ballast/Displacement ratio assumes that ballast is placed optimally, but it doesn’t consider keel type or weight distribution. A deep-keel boat with a low ballast ratio may be more stable than a shallow-keel boat with a higher ballast ratio.

Summary: While design ratios provide a quick reference for comparing sailboats, they don’t fully capture real-world sailing performance. Factors like hull shape, rigging, environmental conditions, and weight distribution play a crucial role in how a boat actually handles. For a complete assessment, sailors should consider practical experience, sea trials, and expert opinions alongside numerical ratios.

More Specs & Key Performance Indicators for Popular Cruising Boats

30' to 35'

35' to 40'

40' to 45'

45' to 50'

50' to 55'

Over 55'