The Rival 38 Sailboat
Key Specs & Performance Indicators

Published Specification for the Rival 38

Keel & Rudder Configuration: Fin keel with rudder on skeg
Hull Material: GRP (Fiberglass)
Length Overall*: 11.45 m (37.58 ft)
Waterline Length*: 8.99 m (29.50 ft)
Beam*: 3.43 m (11.25 ft)
Draft*: 1.62 m (5.33 ft)
Rig Type: Masthead Sloop (some also rigged as cutters)
Displacement*: 7,838 kg (17,280 lbs)
Ballast*: Not consistently published, but some sources indicate encapsulated ballast.
Sail Area*:  56.2m² (605ft²)
Water Tank Capacity: Approximately 416 liters (110 gallons)
Fuel Tank Capacity: Approximately 492 liters (130 gallons)
Hull Speed: 7.28 knots
Designer: Peter Brett
Builder: Rival/Southern Boatbuilding Co. Ltd. (UK) and Marine Construction Ltd. (UK)
Year First Built: 1977
Year Last Built: Not definitively published, but production continued for some years after 1977.
Number Built: 63

* Used to derive the design ratios referred to later in this article - here's how they're calculated...

Options & Alternatives

• The Rival 38 was primarily a masthead sloop. However, some versions were rigged as cutters, which involved adding an inner forestay and staysail. There is no information to suggest ketch or fractional sloop options for the Rival 38.

• The standard version, known as the Rival 38A, featured an aft cockpit and a two-cabin layout. This typically included a forward double berth (sometimes with an infill cushion to create a double), a saloon with two settees that could convert to berths (plus optional pipe cots), a galley, a navigation station, and an aft cabin with either two single berths or a double berth.

• A center cockpit version, known as the Rival 38C, was also available. This version generally offered more headroom and storage space in the aft cabin, and often featured a three-cabin layout with a forward double berth, a saloon, a galley, a navigation station, an aft heads compartment, and an aft cabin that could have either two single berths or a double berth.

Rival 38A Accommodation Layout

Sail Areas & Rig Dimensions

Sail Areas & Rig Dimensions

Sail Areas

• Mainsail Area: 24.0m² (259ft²)
• 100% Foretriangle Area: 32.2m² (347ft²)
• Total Sail Area:56.2m² (606ft²)

Rig Dimensions

• I (Foretriangle Height): 14.75m (48' 5")
• J (Foretriangle Base): 4.37m (14' 4")
• P (Mainsail Hoist): 11.46m (37' 7")
• E (Mainsail Foot): 4.19m (13' 9")

Published Design Ratios
The Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

• Sail Area/Displacement Ratio (SA/D): 17.90
• Ballast/Displacement Ratio (BR): Not consistently published
• Displacement/Length Ratio (D/L): 300.49
• Comfort Ratio: 33.30
• Capsize Screening Formula (CSF): 1.74

Theoretical Sailing Characteristics

The design ratios provide a theoretical insight into the Rival 38's sailing characteristics:

• Sail Area/Displacement Ratio (SA/D = 17.90): An SA/D ratio of 17.90 suggests that the Rival 38 is a reasonably good performer for a cruising sailboat. This ratio indicates a moderate amount of sail area relative to its displacement. In the right conditions, the boat should be able to approach its theoretical hull speed readily. This ratio generally satisfies the performance expectations of most cruising sailors, meaning it won't be a speed demon, but it won't be sluggish either, particularly in moderate to fresh breezes.

• Ballast/Displacement Ratio (BR = Not consistently published, but implied encapsulated): While a precise Ballast/Displacement Ratio isn't readily available in typical published specs, the fact that the Rival 38 has a fin keel with a skeg-hung rudder and is known for its seaworthiness implies a substantial and effective ballast design. Encapsulated ballast means the lead or iron is integral to the hull structure, rather than bolted on. This design contributes to a lower center of gravity and good initial stability, making the boat stiff and capable of standing up to its canvas in a breeze without excessive heel. The lack of a specific percentage makes it harder to compare directly to boats with external ballast, but the overall design suggests a focus on stability.

• Displacement/Length Ratio (D/L = 300.49): A D/L ratio of 300.49 clearly places the Rival 38 in the heavy displacement cruising boat category. This means the boat is robustly built and has significant internal volume. It will be less sensitive to added weight from cruising gear and provisions, maintaining its waterline and performance even when fully loaded. While not ideal for light air coastal sailing where a lighter displacement boat might accelerate more quickly, the Rival 38's heavy displacement makes it exceptionally well-suited for offshore passages and adverse conditions. Its motion in a seaway is likely to be more comfortable and predictable compared to lighter boats.

• Comfort Ratio (33.30): Ted Brewer's Comfort Ratio of 33.30 indicates that the Rival 38 will offer a predictable and acceptable motion in a seaway, characteristic of a moderate bluewater cruising boat. This suggests that the boat's motion will be relatively smooth and comfortable for seasoned sailors, reducing fatigue on longer voyages. It's not so high as to indicate an overly heavy or slow boat, nor so low as to imply a quick, jerky motion.

• Capsize Screening Formula (CSF = 1.74): A Capsize Screening Formula of 1.74 suggests that the Rival 38 would be a safer choice for an ocean passage compared to a boat with a CSF of more than 2.0. This formula primarily evaluates a boat's initial stability and resistance to capsize in rough conditions. A lower CSF indicates greater resistance to being rolled. This ratio reinforces the Rival 38's reputation as a capable and safe offshore cruiser.

In summary, the design ratios collectively paint a picture of the Rival 38 as a highly capable and comfortable offshore cruising sailboat. Its heavy displacement and good stability (indicated by D/L and CSF) suggest it will handle rough seas well and maintain a predictable motion. While not designed for extreme speed, its SA/D ratio indicates respectable performance, allowing it to make good passages without being underpowered. It is a boat built for seaworthiness and reliable passage-making rather than great light-air performance.

But the Design Ratios are Not the Whole Story...

While design ratios provide valuable insights into a sailboat's theoretical characteristics, they come with several significant limitations:

Simplification and Generalization:

• One-Dimensional View: Ratios reduce complex hydrodynamic and aerodynamic interactions to single numbers. They don't account for the nuanced interplay of hull shape, keel and rudder foil sections, mast bend, sail shape, weight distribution, or crew input.

• Idealized Conditions: Most ratios assume ideal sailing conditions (e.g., flat water, steady wind). Real-world performance is heavily influenced by sea state, gusting winds, and current.

• Average Performance: Ratios typically describe average or general performance. A boat might excel in certain conditions (e.g., strong winds) but struggle in others (e.g., light air), which a single ratio won't fully capture.

Lack of Dynamic Information:

• Static Measurements: Ratios are based on static measurements (LOA, LWL, displacement, sail area). They don't account for how these parameters change dynamically when sailing. For example, as a boat heels, its effective waterline length can increase, affecting its hull speed.

• No Heel Angle or Trim: Ratios don't predict performance at various heel angles or states of trim. A boat's performance changes significantly as it heels, affecting wetted surface, form stability, and sail efficiency.

• Steering and Handling: Ratios offer no information on how a boat steers, its balance under sail, or its responsiveness. A boat with "good" ratios might still have heavy steering or a tendency to round up in gusts.

The finer points of Ballast and Stability:

• Ballast Ratio Limitations: The Ballast/Displacement Ratio only tells you the proportion of ballast to total displacement. It doesn't tell you the location of that ballast. Ballast placed deeper (e.g., in a bulb keel) provides a much greater righting moment than the same weight of internal ballast, yet the ratio alone doesn't differentiate this.

• Form Stability vs. Ballast Stability: A boat's overall stability comes from two main components: form stability (derived from hull shape, especially beam) and ballast stability (from the weight of the ballast). Ratios often conflate these or don't provide a clear breakdown, making it hard to understand how a boat will react to different conditions (e.g., a wide, shallow boat might have high initial stability from form, but less ultimate stability than a narrower, deeper boat with more ballast).

Influence of Appendages:

• Keel and Rudder Design: The specific design of the keel (e.g., aspect ratio, foil shape, planform) and rudder profoundly impacts performance, lift, drag, and control. Ratios do not capture these critical design elements.

• Wetted Surface Area: While displacement relates to wetted surface, the actual shape and interaction of the hull and appendages determine the precise wetted surface and its associated frictional drag, which is not directly evident from simple ratios.

Subjectivity and Builder Variations:

• Published Data Accuracy: Builders sometimes publish figures that might optimize ratios for marketing purposes (e.g., using light-ship displacement instead of loaded displacement, or inflated sail areas with large genoas).

• Variations within a Model: Even within the same model, individual boats can vary due to different engines, tank configurations, owner modifications, and accumulated gear, all of which affect actual displacement and trim.

Human Element:

• Crew Skill: The skill and experience of the crew significantly influence a sailboat's performance. A well-sailed boat with "average" ratios can outperform a poorly sailed boat with "excellent" ratios.

• Maintenance and Condition: The condition of sails, rigging, hull cleanliness, and engine maintenance all play a role in actual performance, which ratios cannot reflect.

In conclusion, while design ratios serve as a useful starting point for comparing boats and gaining a general understanding of their theoretical predispositions (e.g., heavy cruiser vs. light racer), they are not a substitute for a comprehensive analysis of the boat's full design, real-world performance reviews, and ideally, personal experience sailing the boat. They provide a quantitative snapshot but lack the qualitative and dynamic information crucial for a complete picture of a sailboat's characteristics.

More Specs & Key Performance Indicators for Popular Cruising Boats

30' to 35'

35' to 40'

40' to 45'

45' to 50'

50' to 55'

Over 55'